Astrology chart location for transits

 

I get a lot of questions about the location used for transit charts. When I do these weekly astrology reports you often see the location as either Arizona or California, because it has to be set to somewhere, and most astrologers use their location as the default location. However, the location is completely irrelevant because I set the chart to 0 Aries (the world point and natural zodiac), so that my reports are for the entire world, not just one location. We don't factor in the Ascendant, Midheaven or houses when looking at transits for the entire world.  

When you see astrologers talking about transits while showing you a chart with their location at that exact time with some random sign rising, that's also irrelevant, besides where the planets are in sign and degree, otherwise that chart is only good for that location at that exact moment in time. This is why they should change it to 0 Aries, unless they are giving a forecast for each of the 12 rising signs. Still though, their location is completely irrelevant when doing that.

Also I keep the transit location the same even when doing personal reports for people all over the world because I place the transit chart to their natal chart, making their birth location the relevant location, so that the outside wheel chart's location is completely irrelevant.  

I hope that clears up any confusion.